The impact of culture-, health-, and nature-based engagement on mitigating the adverse effects of public health restrictions on wellbeing, social connectedness, and loneliness during COVID-19: quantitative evidence from a smaller- and larger-scale UK survey

Thomson, L. J. M. and Spiro, N. and Williamon, A. and Chatterjee, H. J. (2023) The impact of culture-, health-, and nature-based engagement on mitigating the adverse effects of public health restrictions on wellbeing, social connectedness, and loneliness during COVID-19: quantitative evidence from a smaller- and larger-scale UK survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20 (6943). ISSN 1660-4601 (online)

Abstract

Numerous UK surveys conducted during COVID-19 examined the pandemic’s detrimental effects on health, and the consequences of lockdown and other public health restrictions on mental health. Some surveys considered specific populations and social inequities exacerbated during COVID-19. Fewer surveys examined the ways in which the adverse effects of public health restrictions, such as lockdown, shielding and social distancing, might be alleviated. Drawing upon self-determination theory, the purpose of the current study was to assess whether culture-, health- and nature-based engagement would mitigate the effects of these restrictions on psychological wellbeing, social connectedness and loneliness. Quantitative data from a smaller-scale survey (n = 312) and a subset of questions embedded in a larger-scale survey (n = 3647) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. Frequency of engagement, whether participation was online or offline and with or without other people, and the extent to which type of participation was associated with psychological wellbeing, social connectedness and loneliness were examined. Sports and fitness, gardening and reading occurred frequently in both surveys. For the smaller-scale survey, increases in connectedness and frequency of participation and decreases in loneliness were significantly associated with improved wellbeing, whereas the type of participation and age range were not significant predictors. Outcomes from the smaller-scale survey approximated the larger-scale survey for measures of loneliness, type and frequency of participation and proportion of respondents in each age range. As the frequency of participation was a significant predictor of wellbeing, but the type of participation was not significant, the findings implied that any type of participation in a sufficient quantity would be likely to boost wellbeing.

Actions (login required)

View Item